![]() These roads are for local traffic only and don't need to handle that much traffic. I only use them in villages outside of the city where there are no future expansions planned. Thus when starting the first approach might be better. I could upgrade these roads to 6-lane or 8-lane roads if needed and it works better than two one-way roads. In those cases I'm often building two-way roads like you could see below: Especially at junctions you could get into trouble. ![]() ![]() However, when I'm zoning a new area with as main goal to make it high density from the start this approach might work less good. This solution is quite cheap and is good for further developments in the future. The two one-way roads you can see were upgraded to two 4-lane one-way roads, which makes it a nice boulevard that could handle a lot of traffic. Still I'm using roads with the same width in here. All the buildings are high density and all the green places you can see in the distance are being developed. I'll give you some examples below:Ībove you could see a photo of my city when I just started with it. You could actually really lower costs of roads without degrading roads to dirt-roads. Something I could recommend is the Network Extensions Project I was talking about in this thread earlier. I see Only the bare necessity then. Would you mind if I ask you for some example pictures? :DDDDD
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |